bio: peter comitini »

market knowledge
Manhattan market report »
townhouse report »

follow peter comitini

peter's newsletter
sign-up here »

the topics
blogs & sites
for sale or rent
green city
market reports
property geek
questions & answers
tips for buyers
tips for sellers
newsreal bookmarks
peter's photos

real estate services
home page
selling your property
buying a home
browse listings
recent press
contact peter

design & ideas
green design
nyc resources
real estate
real estate: overseas

the archives
April 2014
November 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
July 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
all archives

« previous: redfin spins the new york times   |  next: haunted housing »

Thursday, September 7, 2006

less than zero

Developer Larry Silverstein unveiled the designs for the major buildings that are proposed for the World Trade Center site. David Child's Freedom tower, designed out of the The New York Office of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, is shown here in context with structures by Norman Foster and Richard Rogers, both of London, Fumihiko Maki of Tokyo and Santiago Calatrava of Spain. They are each nice buildings, but is it just me, or is something missing?

I'd hoped for a monumental expression of creativity that would reflect the resilience in the character I saw in my neighbors and honor those who lost their lives on that horrible day. But all we've got here is a commercial real estate development. What's so special about this office complex other than the site it occupies? Is there anything here that makes us exclaim, only in America! This group of buildings lacks a cohesive vision and fails to rise to the occasion. It just does not hold together. What if on this development, we just said the commercial interests take a back seat. What's being done here defines and reflects our character. This property is so much bigger in every way, than usual. Politician's legacies should take second place to the American legacy. I'll bet the results would be so spectacular that their value could not be counted.

These office buildings, which are all designed by successful architects, patronized by a successful real estate developer, and with public accountability provided by successful politicians, just so clearly reflect the results of the well publicized politics and power struggles which have played out over the past five years; and maybe (although I hope not) of the condition of our nation as we struggle to understand our own evolving condition. There's a saying in the design business that a camel is a horse designed by a committee. The site design is an accurate reflection of the dissonant process which gave it shape. Perhaps the expectations on a project like this can never be fully agreed upon and met; but I think that seeing truly visionary design could go a long way to gaining consensus.

See the article in the New York Times. Maybe The Onion got it right this week.

post a comment:

to help fight spam, your comment may need to be approved by the moderator before it appears

we don't collect or share email addresses

email this to a friend:

recipient's email address:

your email address (required):

we don't collect or share email addresses

your personal message (optional):

a link to this page will be included with your message.