bio: peter comitini »

market knowledge
Manhattan market report »
townhouse report »

follow peter comitini

peter's newsletter
sign-up here »

the topics
blogs & sites
for sale or rent
green city
market reports
property geek
questions & answers
tips for buyers
tips for sellers
newsreal bookmarks
peter's photos

real estate services
home page
selling your property
buying a home
browse listings
recent press
contact peter

design & ideas
green design
nyc resources
real estate
real estate: overseas

the archives
April 2014
November 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
July 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
all archives

« previous: the news real: this week's jumplist   |  next: It's official, the Manhattan market is hot again »

Sunday, February 18, 2007

The psychology of pricing & achieving critical mass

inkblot.jpgmarketingThe New York Times Real Estate section's cover this week is on The Psychology of Pricing. It follows on the heals of last week's cover about presenting properties for sale on the Web titled Making Evey Pixel Count, they are both must reads for buyer's and sellers. The pricing article is about what may be running through the minds of buyers, sellers and brokers when thinking about the price of a property and how to approach it. Permit me to use it as a jumping point to add some greater depth about how the psychology of pricing connects with the timing of the best opportunity to sell a home.

"While comparables may be a starting point,
the price at which a seller offers a property is often also based on wishful thinking, propaganda and ploy"
We sometimes hear that after extensively researching comparable sales, looking at the current market landscape, and advising a potential client about the value of their home, that an owner has signed an exclusive with another agency because the agent "quoted a much better target price for the property". The seller based the decision on the somewhat misguided impression that the agent might work harder on their overpriced listing and somehow find that one buyer that absolutely has to buy their home. Could the agent be appealing to the vanities of the seller about their palace— overpricing it to list it. Then moving the seller through a series of price reductions when offers are scarce in the first couple of months? A plan that is not just ineffective, it could hurt also.

timing maximum buyer exposure

The real danger is in the missed opportunity to bring the right buyer to the deal early in the process. The accompanying chart shows buyer interest over the first16 weeks in a listings life. Corcoran Group research shows that the greatest number of potential buyers will come knocking during the first four weeks, and that buyer activity hits a peak around the second week of a listing's life. This is a critical opportunity to sell, and there is no better way to subvert it than by highlighting how great a deal more correctly priced homes look when compared with yours— just as you have the the greatest number of buyers being shown your listing.

‘activity’ is defined as the number of showings; ‘weeks’ is defined as the length of time a property is on the market. data based on Corcoran Group exclusive sales activity.

My job early in the process is to get as many people as possible to see your home and bring offers. Overpricing only helps homeowners to miss the moment. This can have a particularly disruptive effect on people who are trying to coordinate a sale and new purchase. It may invoke additional financing costs to bridge the time gap between sale and purchase— effectively causing the seller to carry two mortgages until the sale closes; or even worse, causing them to loose the deal or deposit on the next home they've set their hearts on. It depends on the terms they've agreed to. Whatever the inconvenience, it's a flawed strategy.

If an apartment is on market for a bit and people say they like it, but don't make offers, it is probably overpriced. If someone doesn't like the home, they won't buy it at any price. There is no worse signal to buyers than a property that's been sitting on the market for too long. People may assume that there are issues other than price alone, and it may actually have the opposite effect— becoming an sign-post for low-ball offers. Right pricing upfront, taps into activity from the maximum number of truly interested parties. Shouldn't you leave some wiggle room for negotiation? Yes, if you have a good broker, they will price correctly and wiggle it up. Why go into any negotiation with the preconceived notion that you'll move down? That's not a smart direction for a seller. Buyer's brokers will notice value in correctly priced listings, and will encourage their customers to bid at, very near, or even above asking price. They have a vested interest in closing a deal, know that the rest of the market will recognize proper value and respond in kind. Their advice to a customer will be to sign a contract quickly.

how to find a qualified co-op candidate

In New York City, cooperative apartments comprise the majority of available homes. Since the co-op's Board of Directors has the power to turn down any application for membership, having a financially well vetted candidate is crucial. A listing broker should recommend a pricing strategy that is more likely to bring multiple offers, as some of them might not get through the Board's approval process. The best way to assure the success of my clients, is to be able to present several qualified candidates to them and discuss their merits. A co-op board turn-down is something that puts a seller back at square one, and since the apartment is now listed as 'back on the market', it gives buyers the impression that the seller may be under pressure to strike a deal. That's a negotiating position which has been compromised.

reaching critical mass

Achieving critical mass, defined as a significant number of interested parties, is done by marketing, open co-brokerage, and a pricing strategy that creates bidding momentum for sellers. Different brokerages provide various levels of effectiveness. My personal sales record is that over 93% of my exclusives sell at or above asking prices. I'd suggest that rather than focusing so much, on "how much", sellers assess the tools and sales performance of the brokerage firms, as well as the individual agents they are interviewing. Having a Web site that draws huge numbers of visitors ( is top ranked), and the creative services to produce memorable property advertising & promotion, are capabilities that a broker brings which are truly critical to the success of the "how much" conversation.

post a comment:

to help fight spam, your comment may need to be approved by the moderator before it appears

we don't collect or share email addresses

email this to a friend:

recipient's email address:

your email address (required):

we don't collect or share email addresses

your personal message (optional):

a link to this page will be included with your message.