bio: peter comitini »

market knowledge
Manhattan market report »
townhouse report »

follow peter comitini

peter's newsletter
sign-up here »

the topics
blogs & sites
for sale or rent
green city
market reports
property geek
questions & answers
tips for buyers
tips for sellers
newsreal bookmarks
peter's photos

real estate services
home page
selling your property
buying a home
browse listings
recent press
contact peter

design & ideas
green design
nyc resources
real estate
real estate: overseas

the archives
April 2014
November 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
July 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
all archives

« previous: Making lemonade at 9 West 19th Street   |  next: Co-ops loosing clout with luxury buyers? »

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Spending green, saving green

green cityThe New York Times Real Estate section ran a cover story today on"The Cost of Saving Energy". It acknowledges that an "energy smart building" is an accolade that can be used in promoting properties to prospective buyers, and something which some developers are seeing as a way of adding a layer of distinction to their projects. Is a real consumer preference for energy efficiency beginning to take shape? I thought that I'd put a poll out to ask readers how they felt about this emerging aspect of buying real estate. If you take a moment to answer the question, you'll receive the instant gratification of seeing the latest results live.

I've yet to have customers ask to only see LEED certified or green buildings, in the same way that they might only consider Tribeca, or something close to Central Park. My impression is that as a practical matter for buyers, it would be too limiting to their possible choices at the moment; but goes into the plus column if all other things are equal. As the perception that green environments are healthier dwellings grows, that may change to a more of a demand than a passive benefit. For aging co-ops and condo buildings it may be a way of increasing or maintaining shareholder and property value.

The Times piece largely considered energy efficiency in light of recouping the cost of the capital improvements. One fascinating comparison that author Alex Tarquino highlighted was that, "In a 60,000-square-foot building with 40 apartments, hiring an electrician to install motion sensors might cost $11,000, according to estimates produced by Optimal Energy Inc....The building could save that much in lower electricity bills over two years, assuming that it was already using fluorescent bulbs, and the sensors alone would reduce its carbon dioxide emissions by about 40 metric tons per year, the company said....That would be the equivalent of driving a car that gets 25 miles per gallon for 110,250 miles, according to Dr. Stuart Gaffin, an associate research scientist at the Center for Climate Systems Research at Columbia University."

One of the authority’s most popular incentives is its low-cost loans to finance major capital improvements. The state will pick up most of the interest costs: for example, on an 8 percent loan, the state will pay 6.5 percentage points and the building 1.5 percentage points.

Of particular interest in the Times piece for NYC co-op & condo boards and landlords, is a sidebar titled "Sometimes, New York State Will Help Pay the Bill". Which highlights incentive programs for energy efficiency through the New York State Energy Research Authority that are available to multifamily buildings with five or more units. These can include the full cost of an energy audit, training of building staff, and low cost loans to finance major capital improvements. Visit their site at for more info.

the results of my last green poll

The results so far of our Top ways to green your home poll posted here and on Barbara Corcoran's blog several weeks ago, indicate that our readers agree with today's New York Times Real Estate cover story. As of today, people chose programing their thermostats and installing compact fluorescent light bulbs, and purchasing Energy Star appliances as among the best and most direct ways of saving energy and reducing the carbon footprints of their homes. Each has received about 20% of the vote so far. Plugging air leaks, reducing water use and choosing green products were also cited by about half as many readers. They are all ways recommended by the US Green Building Council in this download of a 16 Ways to Green Your Home (pdf 116kb). The poll is still open too if you haven't cast your vote yet.

related posts:
What are the best ways to green your home? »
A green tale of urban renewal »

If you'd like to place these polls on your own site, just cut and paste this code into your web page.

For how important are 'energy smart' and 'green' design features to you

<!-- start poll--><script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src=""> </script> <noscript><a href ="">Free Polls</a> - <a href="">Take Our Poll</a></noscript><br><a href="">poll via</a><!--end poll-->

For top ways to green your apartment

<!-- start poll--><script language="javascript" src=""> </script> <noscript> <a href =""> Poll Survey</a> - <a href ="">Take Our Poll</a> </noscript> <br><a href="">poll via</a><!--end poll-->

updated July 16th, 2007

post a comment:

to help fight spam, your comment may need to be approved by the moderator before it appears

we don't collect or share email addresses

email this to a friend:

recipient's email address:

your email address (required):

we don't collect or share email addresses

your personal message (optional):

a link to this page will be included with your message.