bio: peter comitini »

market knowledge
Manhattan market report »
townhouse report »

follow peter comitini

peter's newsletter
sign-up here »

the topics
blogs & sites
for sale or rent
green city
market reports
property geek
questions & answers
tips for buyers
tips for sellers
newsreal bookmarks
peter's photos

real estate services
home page
selling your property
buying a home
browse listings
recent press
contact peter

design & ideas
green design
nyc resources
real estate
real estate: overseas

the archives
April 2014
November 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
July 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
all archives

« previous: manhattan market equilibrium?   |  next: Tribeca and Lower Manhattan public schools zoned  »

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Coop application foiled by Facebook page

Coop application foiled by Facebook page I heard a story about a coop Board turn down last week, when I went out with a customer to look at some Greenwich Village apartments. We dropped by to see a "Gold Coast" property off Fifth Avenue near Washington Square Park, which had just come back on the market. It was a lovely place, in a converted townhouse, with just five units in the building. As we were about to leave, I asked the listing agent why the apartment had come back on the market. It could be for any number of reasons like the buyer exercising a mortgage contingency, or an inspection problem — both of which seemed unlikely by the condition of the building, and the fact that the co-op required a 50% down-payment, which most banks would see as a low risk, loan to value ratio on lending. It turns out that the prospective buyers were the parents of the person whom would be the occupant/tenant of the apartment. The Board's due diligence process included online research of the tenant. It revealed a 'Facebook' page for the potential occupant which included pictures that raised an eyebrow with some the Board members. While I'm not privy to knowing exactly what the problem was, it seems reasonable that some owners became worried about loud parties and late night noise. It projected a questionable image, and the Coop Board turned down the application.

Fair? Its hard to say. Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. Sometimes pictures lie. But the secret to passing a Board's scrutiny is to appear completely uncontroversial. It's a simple lesson, in today's wired world of social networks, potential buyers and their agents, need to review the online presence of the applicants, and edit where needed. As an agent, I go through a very exacting process in preparing financial data and references for Board packages; guiding customers through the coop approval process. That can all be undone today by a few badly considered photos from a New Years party.

post a comment:

to help fight spam, your comment may need to be approved by the moderator before it appears

we don't collect or share email addresses

email this to a friend:

recipient's email address:

your email address (required):

we don't collect or share email addresses

your personal message (optional):

a link to this page will be included with your message.