Friday, February 19, 2010
How negotiable is that apartment?
»Download the report (.pdf)Corcoran just released some more data on the market place in January, which gives us some additional color on what I presented in the most recent market snapshot post. A key trend highlighted is average deal negotiability from the last asking price, and it is shrinking in every price category, when compared with a year earlier. In January 2010, our contracts data signed indicated a range of negotiability between 5% to 7%. Sellers have more realistic notions about price, and buyers aren't imagining doomsday scenarios leading them to half-priced properties. Note too that it is negotiability from last asking price, meaning that a property may have already had one, two, or more, price reductions, before hitting a level which starts to invoke offers. Especially in a market that is operating cautiously at best, sellers overpricing a property will deflect buyer traffic and offers, rather than bringing them to the closing table. Manhattan is a dense, "hyper-local" market. Properties in a very tightly defined area, may have significant fluctuations in value, for reasons that are not always so obvious to buyers or sellers. So there are a few moving parts to this.
A caveat is required to prevent misunderstanding. I'm looking at a very broad and general trend, to get a sense here of where the Manhattan real estate market is headed in 2010. It is a bit like looking at the Dow or NASDAQ, each individual stock does not necessarily move in tandem. Every real estate deal is different too. It does not mean that you should look for a 5% to 7% discount off an asking price. It could easily be more or less. The averages have little bearing on what I might recommend to a customer bidding on a particular unit. That requires both research, and good instinct, built on a working knowledge of the market. It tends to be when an agent earns their keep.
» Inventory and negotiability (138 kb .pdf)
» January 2010 snapshot (156 kb .pdf)

Months of speculation, controversy, and debate ended last Friday as the District 2 Community Education Council voted 6-4 for "Option 2" as the temporary public school zoning for lower Mahhattan including: Tribeca, Battery Park City, The Financial District and Seaport area.
I heard a story about a coop Board turn down last week, when I went out with a customer to look at some Greenwich Village apartments. We dropped by to see a "Gold Coast" property off Fifth Avenue near Washington Square Park, which had just come back on the market. It was a lovely place, in a converted townhouse, with just five units in the building. As we were about to leave, I asked the listing agent why the apartment had come back on the market. It could be for any number of reasons like the buyer exercising a mortgage contingency, or an inspection problem both of which seemed unlikely by the condition of the building, and the fact that the co-op required a 50% down-payment, which most banks would see as a low risk, loan to value ratio on lending. It turns out that the prospective buyers were the parents of the person whom would be the occupant/tenant of the apartment. The Board's due diligence process included online research of the tenant. It revealed a 'Facebook' page for the potential occupant which included pictures that raised an eyebrow with some the Board members. While I'm not privy to knowing exactly what the problem was, it seems reasonable that some owners became worried about loud parties and late night noise. It projected a questionable image, and the Coop Board turned down the application. 

I was surprised to find out that my Christmas postcard from 2004 was being 
I've just brought this special one bedroom apartment back on the market, with it's price improved to $625,000 an excellent value for a location and building of this quality. It is very sunny and quiet, in one of noted architect 


